Welcome to Community Server | | Help
in Search

Wounded Warrior Blog

Let Your Voice be Heard!

 Do you have suggestions for ways the Army, the Department of Defense, or Congress can improve care for Wounded Warriors?  If so, we want to hear from you! This year, for the fourth year in a row, you have the opportunity to affect change in the policies, procedures, regulations and legislation related to wounded warrior care. All you need to do is submit your issues to the 4th Annual AW2 Symposium. 

 I am MAJ Deb Cisney of the Illinois Army National Guard.  I have been honored to serve you as a member of the AW2 Operations Staff for the last two years.  My focus is on ensuring the systemic issues AW2 Soldiers and Families have identified are brought to the attention of, and addressed by, senior leaders throughout our Army-including the Guard and Reserves, the Department of Defense, the Office of the Secretary of Defense and Congress. 

 Being a simple, country girl from the cornfields of south-central Illinois, I, like many of you, always figured my personal opinion didn’t matter much in the grand scheme of things.  What I have learned and seen first-hand, though, is that our opinions do matter.  Our Government is listening…and our Nation is listening! 

AW2 Symposium issues and recommendations related to medical hold and medical holdover significantly contributed to the creation and design of the Army’s new Warrior Transition Units (WTU) and Soldier Family Assistance Centers (SFAC).  AW2 Symposium recommendations have also made important contributions to new legislation that benefit our wounded Soldiers. An example is legislation that increased the maximum amount for the VA housing accommodation.

It is not too late to tell us “where to go.”  Go to http://aw2portal.com/IssuesForm.aspx to submit your issues and recommendations.  Let your voice be heard! 

I SALUTE YOU!!

 - Deb Cisney, AW2 Operations

Published Monday, April 21, 2008 6:47 PM by admin

Comments

 

MaryKay Canarte said:

I would hope that we would provide access to the many resources that wounded soldiers need and deserve.

Legal Assistance Referral network

Mental Health Assistance Network

Family Support/Financial Planning Assistant Resources/Newtork.

The Montgomery County Bar Association has a Montgomery County Legal Assistant Network manual (MCLAN) that list referrals for Montgomery County Residents - The military should develop such a manual and website listing available resources.

I am an attorney who represents several service members at AAFB in family law matters and I know the stresses of military life from these cases as well as from my own personal experiences as a wife on a service member.

MaryKay Canarte

910 Veirs Mill Road

Rockville MD  20851

(866) 460-4864

April 21, 2008 2:45 PM
 

Stephen Ecsedy said:

Mu Uncle was a WWII wounded 3 times vetr with jungle rot and malaria and also curverature of the spine due to all the operations for hiws wounds. He just died last month at 95 years of age not even a military funeral. He livedl out  of state for me althopugh I flew down to visit him many times in NM. He was always complaining about the government cuting his benefits and making him pay for some of his meds even the ones for his service connected physical problems. They were treating.

April 21, 2008 2:50 PM
 

SGT Kutter, Bryan A. said:

Soldiers that have been injured overseas and pu onto a Med-Hold/Holdover are not eligible for PDMRA leave.  This should be fixed being the soldier is still on orders and should be accumulating this leave just like any other soldier.

April 21, 2008 3:37 PM
 

Nathan Wilde said:

I have always been confused about why the US Army found me 'fit for duty', sent me home from the hospitol without so much as a thank you and let the VA pick up the tab?  The VA has found me 70% disabled and it may go higher?

April 21, 2008 4:06 PM
 

rick flood (ret) said:

I attempted to enroll when I separated. I was put out of the army broken, (broken back/broken neck) I was told I was the VA's problem now. I became paralysed from the neck down and had to pay out of my own pocket for c-spine surgery. The VA didnt do right by me and neither did the army. I tried to enroll in AW2 but never heard a word. I tried to obtain items to relieve pain and discomfort through Megan Dulaney but got no where. I have recieved nothing from anyone related to this organization. Perhaps a clearer enrollment would be a good start as well as feedback on the application process as to whether or not I was accepted or something. As it is, I one of the faithless in this venue. Thanks for inquiring on my opinion. Rick Flood
April 21, 2008 9:59 PM
 

Ancel Bell said:

I believe that the Government has a long way to go for Veterans.

Family awareness for wounded Veterans is a good step. Actual care of the Veterans and preventitive care for Active Soldiers would be even a futher step. Proper care for injuries in the service would possibly cut down on the dissabilities that Soldiers come out of the service with. Making sure that Veterans are aware of all services and benifits that are available to them. I believe that the VA hides the benifits from Veterans and takes their disablities as a joke sometimes.

April 22, 2008 1:27 AM
 

admin said:

Thank you for your issue recommendations. These will passed along and considered for the AW2 Symposium. Also, you can go  http://aw2portal.com/IssuesForm.aspx to submit your issues and recommendations.

April 22, 2008 2:43 PM
 

Paul Dudley said:

Forgive my rant; I've never done a blog before.

I am a disabled Vet of OIF I.  The injuries sustained in combat 2003 forced my resignation in 2004 because I could no longer manage the physical/mental issues and effectively lead and manage my responsibilities.  I still miss my Soldiers.  

I manage nerve, TBI related issues, PTSD, and several physical conditions that keep me occupied through private physicians - I've learned to manage these and live life.  What bothers me is that the Army Med Reviews only merited me for release and not retirement after 16 years service knowing that combat caused the issue not my desire to leave - okay; moreover the severance I received by the Army is now being deducted from my VA compensation?!  The VA rated me at 100% the moment I left the service for unemployability while I recovered.  I now rate 90% having become gainfully employed again.  I'm still recovering physically and mentally - some I will live with the rest of life.  It happens...  The kicker is I have VA but I have no retirement to lean on should the graces that allow me to work now give out.  Its a catch 22.

Two things...First, there are many more Soldiers out there that are worse than me and God Bless Them because I understand.   I've led Soldiers and I have followed the leaders - the effort, pain, anguish, and fear are overcome by grit, and sheer loyalty to one another...this is what I miss.

Two, and relevant to this Blog...As the numbers increase of service related issues and Soldiers and who are now in theater come home, whether in WTU or active and ending their obligations - the medical review systems in each regional medical center on Army and other installations need better interrogatory methods of deciding how and who gets released by severance or retirements.  Army has done a tremendous job managing a difficult position but policies are only effective if the procedures and the people who make those critical decisions of a Soldiers future are in sync.

Simple reminders, check ups, etc. from DA / DOD to hospital officials - and then a feedback back to DA/DOD with results of check ups.  From "little town" USA to the well known "Walter Reeds" that doctors, physicians and administrators need not be impatient or irritated or overwhelmed...walk a mile in combat first - then judge.  Don't take advantage of a Soldier or discount a Soldier that seems okay - being mangled doesn't have show through a missing limb - and categorize his needs until the history of why and how he ended up in the WTU or in MRB in the first place.  Policies work if people understand the person first.  Policy is also a two way street.  We tend to overlook the details by opinionating the obvious - medical science is a people practice first then a science.  It's difficult, timely, and exhausting but time tells the significance of patience to patience.  I think back and remember not wanting to fight the MRB process because of the AC regulations of physical requirements and MRB - I should have.  

I'm not blogging because I'm angry - God has a plan for me.  I've been in a fog for nearly 4 years after my return and I've come out slowly; seen the damage and seen many things that a clearer mind wouldn't have said yes to or fought harder to retain.  

Personally, now, I thank the Army - I'd have never felt the privilege of leading some of the greatest people on the planet...it was an honor.  I'm just concerned about the next guy.

April 23, 2008 5:43 AM
 

Mike Conklin said:

AW2 has been great to work with. Biggest issue we have is identifying wounded as to locations of where they want to go and matching that community with our program. Also the lack of programs at hospitals in getting them a head start on the education process. With many in the hospitals for months they need to start on getting ready to enter college by testing and applications so when the get home there is no delay on them starting school. This is a leadership issue at hospitals. Vb, Mike Conklin President Sentinels of Freedom Scholarship Foundation
April 23, 2008 11:07 AM
 

Ashley said:

My complaint is soldiers who are in the MEB process are looked down on by their chian of command and are picked on. I talked to one particular soldier, no name mentioned, who has been in the MEB process for months on end. One particular SFC. has constantly been on his case since finding out he was in the process of goint into WTU. Also, on other particulr SGT has done everything they possibly could to hold up his process to going into WTU. For example, after numerous failed attempts to keep him in the unit and him proving that they had lied on several occasions, she brought up that he was late back in January, grant it it is April and gave him an article 15, which holds him from going into WTU. Now know that the Commander verbally told him that he wasn't going to go any farther on the matter of him being late and just verbally couseled him about that matter and months later he is getting an Article 15. Its mighty funny how he has been in no trouble what so ever in the last 3 months, but thats because his SGT. has been gone, not even 24 hrs after he/she comes back he is getting an article 15 and grant it the commander is on leave. He speculates that right before the commander left on leave the SGT. went in talked him into going through with an Article 15. Let it known that this particular soldier has missed going on 4 doctors appointments because the SFC. tells him to do mission first. I do have the understanding that a soldier can continue be held into an unit AS LONG AS THEY ARE NOT MISSING DOCTORS APPOINTMENT. I have many other soldiers who have stories on how their process is not an easy one and how they are automatically in the spot light once their chain of command is aware that they are requesting to go to WTU. I could have probably provided more information, but I didn't want to give out any names are anything that could indentify the unit or person. There should be some type of system that protects the soldier from being personally attacked by his chain of command. There has to be some way that this soldier could be moved out of his unit into the WTU and having his chain of command bringing stuff up from months ago just to keep in the unit. He believes that they are trying to do all they can to chapter in out and him not recieve the medical help that he deserves. I have seen some evidence that to me proves his case, but no will step up to listen. There has to be a system put into place to protect these soldiers once going into the process of WTU and have someone they can plead a case to and listen to the facts of the problem.
April 23, 2008 11:36 AM
 

Gary Sawyers said:

Why is it taking the DOD so long to get the new CRSC paper work in place !!!
April 29, 2008 12:06 AM
 

David Ward said:

I agree with the comments about soldiers going through the MEB process and that their command can denigrate a soldier.  I have a written LOD from the war. My MEB was held up because my orthopedic surgeon would not sign a form about me not having asthma, etc, that he does not test.  I was told to go to a private doctor and

have the forms un-related to my knee surgery completed and pay for it

myself.  I already had a 5 year physical coming up and was ready willing

and able to go to any doctor they wanted me to go to.  I was not going

to pay for this myself.  I was told therefore, I could not be granted a

P3 to go to an MEB.  

I was put in limbo for months until I contacted an Ombudsman who contacted the PEBLO at a military hospital, who had me come in - in one week to start the MEB process in March.  The G1 of the higher unit assisted me in every possible way in obtaining orders to go to my appointments.

In the interim I discovered my unit's surgeons office of my RRC issued a voucher for me to have an examination it has been in my UA's office for over two months - not acted on.  

After the RRC and surgeons office discovered I was going for an MEB evaluation

at a military hospital my personnel file was electronically altered to

show I had taken over 130 active duty days so I would not get orders to

go to the military hospital.  Higher HQ G1 and I would straighten this

out, but it was done two more times.

As I go through this process I am getting more and more medical appointments at the facility which is 105 miles from me.  Since my condition has worsened I have had to rely on others to drive me to these appointments.  Usually a soldier is placed  on AD, Med Hold etc, while this process is going on.  It would appear though I am lucky just to get the individual day orders.

This stigma started allegedly because my orthopedic doctor would not sign things outside his practice.  I think it is more fundamental in the way the soldier is looked at when he seeks this kind of assistance.  These attitudes will take a long time to change and as long as soldiers can be treated with disregard until CNN puts it on the news, it will continue.  Of course the alternative would be me still waiting from November 2007, no profile, and voucher for exam not acted on in almost three months, and not being the best asset for my unit because of the physical limitation.

May 15, 2008 8:10 AM
New Comments to this post are disabled